Comparison of Dracula and Bram Stokers Dracula Essay -- Comparison Co

match/Contrast Dracula and Bram Stokers Dracula A noticeable difference in the way movies have changed everyplace the years is evident when comparing and contrastive two films of different eras which belong to the comparable genre and contain the same subject intimacy. Two vampire movies, Dracula and Bram Stokers Dracula, present an interesting vitrine of this type of study. Comparing the 1931 variation of Dracula, starring Bela Lugosi, with Frances fording Coppolas Bram Stokers Dracula 1993 version yields some similarities. Both films atomic number 18 of the same genre Horror. Both films argon set around the same time period. also, both deal with a vampire coming to England and causing disruptions in peoples lives. Beyond these few similarities are numerous contrasts. An obvious difference in these films is that the 1931 version played to a Depression audience and that the Coppola version played to a modern audience. (I am being extremely careful because, obviously, the 19 31 audience was modern in 1931 however, we alike(p) to think of ourselves as being more modern than past generations. at that place are differences in the audiences which viewed the respective versions in their time, and I hope to parent this point as the paper unfolds.) When we compare the portrayal of characters in the areas of gender, race, and age, we befall striking contrasts. In the 1931 version, mens roles are well-defined they are the protectors. For example, Jonathan hovers over mynah bird in umteen scenes, giving us the impression that Mina is a helpless creature. In Coppolas version, Jonathan is by no means a protector. He barely escapes Draculas castle Mina has to go to him--to protect him. Also interesting, are the differences in the portrayal of the women in these film... ... audience handle this, or is it because they demand realism? Possibly, this demand for realistic interpretation of subject matter is a major cause of the differences between these films howe ver, as was shown in this paper, on that point are also other reasons for the variations. 1931 was a time of poverty for many Americans who needed escape into a film where traditional values were upheld where graven image wins where men and womens roles are well-defined and where order reigns. Coppolas version has been released in a time where the patriarchal system has begun to break down where prejudice is no longer acceptable (still practiced, but not acceptable) and where we require everything to be extreme. BibliographyBram Stokers Dracula. Dir. Frances Ford Coppola. Columbia TriStar Home Video, 1993. Dracula. Dir. Tod Browning. Universal Pictures Corporation, 1931.